Zero Trust Posture Management
Closing the loop on Zero Trust™
Eliminate implicit trust inside SaaS at the application level
Zero Trust (ZT) architectures operate on the principle that trust should never be assumed implicitly, regardless of the network location or asset ownership. Today, enterprise assets are not confined to a controlled network but rather spread across cloud services, remote offices, and mobile workers.
AppOmni extends Zero Trust beyond your network and infrastructure levels into SaaS applications with Zero Trust Posture Management (ZTPM™). It closes critical gaps at the application level, such as misconfigurations in access controls, unchecked privileges, data leaks, or overlooked third-party integrations.
End-to-end Zero Trust Security
Dynamic Policy Enforcement
Strong Identity and Access Protection
Extend your zero trust architecture to SaaS apps & data
Zero Trust (ZT) is an effective framework that secures today’s distributed organizations by leveraging continuous verification and the principle of “never trust, always verify” — regardless of network boundaries. Ensure Zero Trust doesn’t stop at the network edge.
How AppOmni bridges a critical gap in network-centric Zero Trust (ZT) architectures
See AppOmni in action
AppOmni’s agentless architecture delivers continuous SaaS and AI security monitoring with timely insights and remediation guidelines to help you prevent data breaches. The platform provides a central control point for all managed SaaS applications in your organization.
Latest Resources
-
The SaaS Visibility Trap: Why Seeing SaaS Risk Isn’t the Same as Securing It
Seeing SaaS risk isn’t securing it. Learn why SaaS visibility alone can’t prevent incidents and how to close the gap.
-
SaaS Is The New Frontline: What Recent SaaS Supply Chain Attacks Teach Us About Modern Cyber Risk
Attacks from both UNC6040 and UNC6395 serve as stark examples of the growing SaaS supply chain threat.
-
Hackers Extorting Salesforce After Stealing Data From Dozens of Customers
“What is novel here is the attempt to frame alleged negligence not just against customers, but against the vendor and its native, first-party security tools.”